Dear Team,
As you must be knowing, there was a huge difference in the level of difficulty in the Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation section of slot 1 and slot 2 in the X-GMT examination, I sincerely request you to kindly share the normalization process of the paper.
Dear Sir, since the questions asked in Slot 2 were much of higher difficulty than Slot 1, it will be sheer injustice to the candidates from slot 2 if the scores are not normalised, and made transparent. I would be obliged, if the process is shared.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Regards
Arpit Biswal
As you must be knowing, there was a huge difference in the level of difficulty in the Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation section of slot 1 and slot 2 in the X-GMT examination, I sincerely request you to kindly share the normalization process of the paper.
Dear Sir, since the questions asked in Slot 2 were much of higher difficulty than Slot 1, it will be sheer injustice to the candidates from slot 2 if the scores are not normalised, and made transparent. I would be obliged, if the process is shared.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Regards
Arpit Biswal
Dear Sir,
The QA and DI questions asked in Slot 2 were much more difficult than Slot 1. Kindly follow proper normalization process and share the process details for transparency.
The QA and DI questions asked in slot 2 were much more difficult that slot 1 kindly follow proper normalization process and share the process details for transparency.
I Shivani Tripathy, request the managing authority to kindly look into the matter as this can hamper a studentās life and career.
The questions of quantitative aptitude and data interpretation was very difficult in slot 2 as compared to slot 1 in Xgmt exam. As a result percentile differences can reject a deserving candidate.
I request the authorities to kindly follow the normalisation process and take necessary steps to save candidates future who have really worked hard for Xgmt exam.
I Sachidananda Tripathy, request the Admission authority to kindly look into the matter as soon as possible .
The questions of quantitative aptitude and data interpretation was very difficult in slot 2 as compared to slot 1 in Xgmt exam. As a result percentile differences can reject a deserving candidate.
I request the authorities to kindly follow the normalisation process and take necessary steps to save candidates future who have really worked hard for Xgmt exam.
The difficulty level between the morning sitting and the afternoon sitting brings a lot of questions over the efficiency and credibility of the examination committee. The level of difference was so high that even attempting a single question was on the basis of oneās guts rather than calculations.
Please look into this matter and openly bring forth the criteria being followed for shortlisting of candidates.
Taking out two different lists of selected candidates for each individual sittings does proper justice to all the candidates appeared for the examination. Otherwise the second seaters would be competing against the ones who got an upper hand due to the indifference happened during the making of the question paper.
Iām Sachidananda Tripathy. I would like to mention that in XGMT paper , the QA and DI Section of slot 2 is much more difficult than slot 1. I request the Admission Team of XIM University to look into this matter as soon as possible.
I request the Admission Authorities to kindly do normalisation process for the evaluation.
Apart from being difficult, many questions and their options were wrong. This discrepancies can severely affect a students career due to negative marks in wrong questions, leading to heavy turbulence in percentiles. I request all the members to look into the matter.
Dear Team,
In Xgmt test, 4-5 questions, in DI section in slot 2 had errors in the options, since no options matched with the correct answers. I nearly wasted 6-8 minutes in solving the questions only to find them not present in the options. I had left few of those questions and had marked some of them with their closest values. Later when I tried to solve the questions at home with some memorized data, and discussed the same with other candidates, I am of the opinion, that the questions did not have the correct answers in their options.
Dear Sir, with XIM being my dream institute, I have worked really hard for the examination, and as you know, that a single mark can cause a huge difference in the Percentiles, I sincerely request you to kindly evaluate those questions and do the needful, by either providing grace marks or cancelling those questions, and sharing the marks proportionally.
As you must be knowing, there was a huge difference in the level of difficulty in the Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation section of slot 1 and slot 2 in the X-GMT examination, I sincerely request you to kindly share the normalization process of the paper.
Dear Sir, since the questions asked in Slot 2 were much of higher difficulty than Slot 1, it will be sheer injustice to the candidates from slot 2 if the scores are not normalised, and made transparent. I would be obliged, if the process is shared.
Dear Anshul, though you share the same concern as mine, I insist you to not directly copy paste my writing, as I believe it weakens the purpose and seems from some motivated toolkit. Request you to put the same, in your own words.