CAT 2015 Experiences, Slot 1

Share you CAT 2015 experiences, reviews and analysis in the following format :

CAT Center:

1) How many questions did you attempt(section wise)?

2) Range of mock scores?

3) How was your experience of the test?

4) What was the surprise element for you?

5) Your overall analysis of the exam. Toughness, new topics, sections etc.

6) Any other query or something you would like to share.

Important :-While discussing, please follow the Disclaimers Regarding conduct of CAT strictly. Do NOT discuss the actual questions, exam pattern or solutions. Anyone found violating will be summarily banned.

VA 33

DILR 14... rape ho gaya ....

QA 31 ..... ek definetly wrong hain..... takin 5 to be on safer sideย 

ACCURACY HAS ALWAYS BEEN SPOIL SPORT FOR ME ...... QA ke question 2 baar read kar ke aswer kiya same for DILR ....

QA 78 ...... lets hope for best ......ย 

VA:27

DILR:17 :/

QA:29

DILR ne toh dimag ka bh***a kar diya.

VA: Attempted 34(Accuracy god knows.I just hope that accuracy is good in this section).

DI: Attempted 19(14 correct.Rest tukkas so mostly wrong)

QA:Attempted 34(Hope that accuracy is fine)

Overall:87(82 genuine)

Mock scores:In range of 97.5-99.9

Hope:Just hope that things go well.

Cheers..

VA 29 attempted (13 odd correct)

LRDI 24 attempted (21-22 correct)

Quant 34 attempted (28-29 corect)

Overall 87 attempted.

Mocks percentile fluctuated in the 90s. Average would be around 97-98.

Net score would be around 170-175. 

VRC I have no clue whether the paper was easy or not because that's my weak point. DI was tough. Spent about 25 odd minutes on 2 sets, still couldn't solve those. QA questions were easier compared to last year but with the addition of 15 non MCQ, the overall QA difficulty went up I would say

Time's CAT 2015 Analysis - Forenoon Sessionย 

No. of attempts for 95%ile:

VA : 22-24

DILR : 11-12

QA : 21-23

OA : 54-59

No. of attempts to cross 99%ile:

VA : 26-28

DILR : 14-15

QA : 25-27

OA : 65-70

(With 80% accuracy)

Feeling optimistic all of a sudden!ย 


http://www.time4education.com/analysis-and-call-predictor-for-cat-15.asp

CAT Center: Sri Balaji Society Pune

1) How many questions did you attempt(section wise)?

VA:34

DI:22

QA:29

OA:85

2) Range of mock scores?

99 percentile+

CAT14: 99.41

3) How was your experience of the test?

Admin process was smooth

4) What was the surprise element for you?

Instructions main kuch aur(DI sets of 2 or 4 qtns and RC of 4 qtns) and reality main kuch aur. And of course the horror of DILR.

5) Your overall analysis of the exam. Toughness, new topics, sections etc.

Medium tough DILR tha and having experience of solving such sets successfully in a time constrained environment was crucial for that magical 25+ attempts. No number theory qtns in QA was a big surprise

6) Any other query or something you would like to share.

None

CAT Center:

aalim muhammed salegh college of engineering, chennai

1) How many questions did you attempt(section wise)?

VA/RC - 30

DI/LR - 21

QA - 23 ๐Ÿ˜ž

2) Range of mock scores?

No mocks taken this year.ย 

CAT '12 93.xx, CAT '13 98.xx, CAT '14 98.xx

I don't remember the actual percentiles.

3) How was your experience of the test?

I took the CAT in the same center where I took it last year. The overall process was smooth and glitch free.

4) What was the surprise element for you?

RCs were very easy, come on I was expecting at least 2 tough RC passages. Anyway DI LR and QA were similar to last year. And the instruction regarding the RCs was a bit misleading.ย 

5) Your overall analysis of the exam. Toughness, new topics, sections etc.

I believe with enough preparation all the questions were answerable in VA/RC. DI/LR needed the selection of right caselets while spending minimum time on ignoring the tough ones. QA was easy-medium and I was a bit rusty here. With enough preparation answering 30+ would have been easy.

6) Any other query or something you would like to share.

CAT results have always been a pandora's box at least for me. Keep calm and prepare for XAT :)ย 

ATB!! ๐Ÿ˜ƒ ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

We have launched a new version of our PaGaLGuY Android App. You can now connect with aspirants near your exam center. Select your city from the list and get instantly connected with your fellow aspirants.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pagalguy.groups

http://i.imgur.com/7Y4eroh.jpg

Guysย 

VARC - 21 attempts (90% accuracy)

DILR - 16 attempts (80% accuracy)

QA - 19 attempts (85% accuracy)ย 

Will this fetch an overall 80th percentile ??

Gave this one after a hiatus of 1 year just for fun!

Posting for reference of others ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

AT Center: NEHU, Shillong

1) How many questions did you attempt(section wise)?

VA: 32

DI: 20

QA: 30

OA:82

2) Range of mock scores?

CAT11: 99.33, CAT13: 99.46, CAT14:99.71

3) How was your experience of the test?

Process was pretty smooth

4) What was the surprise element for you?

Pretty much everything. Out of touch and damn rusty as gave this one straight after CAT 14 but surprisingly a good paper.ย 

5) Your overall analysis of the exam. Toughness, new topics, sections etc.

QA - Moderate and required an eye for detail

RC's - Good reads and straightforward questions

VA - Not that easy PJ's but pretty easy summary based questions

LRDI - Moderate - Tough -> WIMWI showed its clout here ๐Ÿ˜›

6) Any other query or something you would like to share.

None

Looking at CAT '14 and CAT '15, how would they compare in terms of difficulty?

SCORE AROUND 80...WILL THIS FETCH 80 PERCENTILE

CAT Centre : GJIMT,Mohali

Attempts:

Verbal and RC : 26

DILR : 23

Quant : 30

Overall: 79

Range of Mock Scores : between 97 and 99.5x

Experience:

In the beginning got some error on my system so around 5-8 minutes were wasted due to this, after that the test went smoothly.

Surprise Element:ย 

easy Quant Section,

and also in the instructions it was clearly written that passages will be of 4 questions each but that wasn't the case.

Overall Analysis:ย 

VA was moderate ( va is my weakest section), The pj's were tough but the RC's were doable.

DILR was moderate to tough, Luck was on my side as i didnt wasted any time over the tough sets and was able to target the easy ones at the start that gave me confidence.

QA was easy, so many sitters, i attempted all the tita questions. out of my 30 attempts around 27 are serious one's..

Any other query:

What score is required for a 99 percentile according to you guys?

Eng 31

LRDI 22

Quant 28

OA 82

Accuracy :Dont wanna think ๐Ÿ˜›

Eng and quant was failry easy.LR in particular was a bit complex.RC ok.PJ diff.Quant felt so easy that i had to cross check some ques 2-3 times cuz ans came straight away(As i was thinking its cat there must be a trap question).Few ques required calc and some derivation so left them.

The test centre was ok.Had load shedding couple of times but that was repaired before the test commenced.people were particularly casual and good and comparatively less vigilante :P.

It was a nice exp.

And for follow members asking for previous year percentile vs marks.Here's a link.It might help


https://kakliya_chandresh.quora.com/Overall-scaled-CAT-score-vs-CAT-percentile-2014

The questions that I missed but could have done, the ones I wasted time on , the wasted last 20 seconds....they are all haunting me.

Verbal -77 , dilr-36, quants 27 ..overall 140. .what could be expected percentil . .. Also what could be verbal percentile and DI one ... Any hope of FMS call

CAT Center: Tiwari College, Mira Road

Pre-test: I had planned to sleep by 10 p.m. but no, life is never so simple. People decided to wait till the last minute to ask doubts/panic/broadcast good luck messages/generally lose their heads. ๐Ÿ™ˆ I eventually slept at 2 and woke at 4:30, feeling downright grumpy. A bath and a (very strong and sweet) coffee made life look more bearable and I set out. 2 hours of train journey later, I was at the centre feeling surprisingly fresh.

The check-in process was pretty smooth (more so than last year) and I had an hour to kill in the lab. Tedium. Then the fun began, with the instructions (parts of which were copied straight out of last year's manual, I suspect, and were hence not totally appropriate - they mentioned "4-question" RCs and DI/LR sets of "2 to 4 questions" throwing me into confusion for a bit. The instructions for the scientific calculator were downright scary "it will display till 15 decimal places and then round off" indeed ๐Ÿ˜’

1) How many questions did you attempt(section wise)?

VA-34 DILR-32 QA-34 OA: 100

(Standard disclaimer: Don't read too much into that. I rely on speed and not accuracy. So I pretty much always attempt all the questions if I can. I typically have time left over, so I see no point in leaving a question unless it is highly ambiguous. If accuracy happens to happen, that's a bonus ๐Ÿ˜ )

2) Range of mock scores?

NA, not taken any mocks.

3) How was your experience of the test?

Very smooth. The interface worked just fine, and the invigilators, at least in my centre, were civilised and helpful (and non-disturbing).

4) What was the surprise element for you?

Despite the mock test and IIMA's insistence that it would be indicative, I had not expected to see 24 RCs. (Mea culpa - I called that one totally wrong :sad: ). Add to that 5 Parajumbles and the rest basically para- and comprehension-based as well, and the Verbal section was extremely one-dimensional. I guess IIMA is looking for people who can handle their case-based methodology?

Having said which, I like RC over VR any day, so I found this a perfectly cromulent state of affairs ๐Ÿ˜

Also, 15 TITA questions in QA. And 13 Arithmetic questions. You gotta be kidding me! ๐Ÿ˜ณ

5) Your overall analysis of the exam. Toughness, new topics, sections etc.

VA: Similar to last year's level, different in structure. Not too ambiguous (which was a pleasant surprise after the VA sections in the last two IIMA-conducted tests). The TITA parajumbles were unnerving, but really you would sink or swim depending on where you stand w.r.t. RCs.

DILR: Again, similar to last year's level (tough!) but with the added misery of a time limit. TITA questions with large numbers as the answers meant random guessing was never going to be of realistic use. This is the section that would make or break the challenge of most serious test-takers, the game-changer.

QA: Almost as easy as last year's; the key here was really to not panic after that DILR but to start afresh with a clear head - 25 attempts with a good accuracy were perfectly manageable.

The TITA questions meant a lot more of uncertainty, but other than the aforementioned parajumbles they were mostly straightforward. The other major change, the calculator, was a useful tool if used in moderation. One irritation in both of those was the fact that if you clicked twice on the same number on the onscreen keypad in quick succession, only one click was recorded. So when entering a number like 2240 it would appear as 240 and you would have to redo the whole thing (if you spotted the error at all). I had entered two TITAs wrong which I spotted almost at the end of the QA paper (don't know if any more escaped my notice...wondering about one entire DI set now!)

6) Any other query or something you would like to share.

Nothing as such. All the best to everyone! May the scores be with you... ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

My attempts were:

VARC - 30 ( 25-26 correct)
LRDI - 16 (15 correct)

QA - 25(22-23 correct)

What can be my approx percentile this year?


VARC - 25(Moderate)

DILR - 15 ๐Ÿ˜ฏ(Need I mention ๐Ÿ˜ˆ)

QA - 31(Easy)

Total - 71

Mock Score range 97%le - 99%le

Experience of test - Average (Expected better from IIM A)

Surprise element - Easy QA