Dear PaGaLGuY readers,

As we all know, Quantitative Aptitude
or Numerical Aptitude is an important component of a number of competitive
examinations such as the UPSC Civil Services Examination, Banking Entrance
Examinations, SSC CGL/CHSL Examination, MBA Entrance Examination, Combined
Defence Services Examination, etc. In order to help you practice and improve
your quantitative ability, we are providing you this Quantitative Aptitude
Quiz.

Given below are a few questions from
SSC examinations held in the last few years. Leave your answers/ responses in
the comments section below and we’ll soon let you know the correct answers!

Directions (1 to 5): Read the graph
and answer the questions

1. What is the difference in profit between 1983 and
1984 (in lakhs of rupees)?

(a) No profit             (b) 5                (c) 10                (d) 15

2.  The number
of years in which the income is more than the average income of the given years
is

(a) one                    (b) two                  (c) three               (d) four

3.  The ratio of
the average income of all the years to the average profit is?

(a) 24:13             
(b) 48:17                (c)
12:7             (d) 6:5

4.  Percentage
increase in profit in 1986 over 1982 is?

(a) 150%           
(b) 120%             (c) 100%             (d) 80%

5.  The total
income exceeds the total expenditure over the years 1982 to 1986 by

(a) 85 lakh           
(b) 105 lakh            (c) 115
lakh             (d) 120 lakh

To
get fresh updates about different exams on your Facebook & Twitter
timelines, subscribe to our pages created specifically for them. We will post
only exam specific links on these pages:

Bank PO:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pagalguybankpo

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PaGaLGuYBankPO

SSC – CGL:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pagalguy-SSC-CGL-Others/879667042056262

Twitter: https://twitter.com/pagalguyssc

UPSC:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Pagalguy-UPSC-951926044840262/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PaGaLGuYUPSC

Write Comment