• Home
  • News
  • Forums
    • CAT & related B-schools
    • XAT, SNAP, IIFT, MAT, CMAT   and related B-schools
    • CAT: Quant Prep
    • CAT: Verbal Prep
    • CAT: GK & other resources
    • GMAT & GRE prep
    • GMAT accepting B-schools
    • Jobs & Careers
    • Pre-MBA Jobs
    • Post-MBA Jobs
    • Chit-Chat
    • PG-Meets & Events
    • Life @ B-schools
    • Touching Lives
  • Apps
    • Townhall
    • Badges
    • Birthdays
  • Rankings
 

Messages

Send a New Message
View All

Notifications

View All

Karma Updates

View All
    Live Ticker
    Login
    • Forgot password?

    New to PaGaLGuY?

    Login ×

    New to PaGaLGuY? Sign Up!

    Login

    Login
    Forgot your password/username?

    Forgot your password? ×

    Advertisements
    Advertisements
    CAT could evolve to become an adaptive test: IIMC director Shekhar Chaudhari
    by Lajwanti D'Souza in IIMC, Prof Shekhar Chaudhari on 14 September '12

    Prof Shekhar Chaudhari

    The Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIMC) has kicked-off a few radical moves in the last few months. From initiating ‘reservation’ for women applicants to aggressively going after alumni to keep its infrastructure plans ticking. IIMC director Professor Shekhar Chaudhuri, spoke to PaGaLGuY about these measures and also on his institute's contribution to homogenising higher education in India.

    What, in your opinion is the contribution of older IIMs, in raising the bar of management education in India?

    IIM Calcutta and IIM Ahmedabad – the first two IIMs to be established by the Govt. of India have played a pioneering role in introducing formal management education in the country and in making a major contribution in professionalising management in Indian organizations.

    The IIMs have been successful in popularising management education to such an extent that it created a great interest amongst students in the country to opt for ‘management’ as an attractive career option. Over the years, some of the brightest students in the country have been opting to join the IIMs in the two year post graduate programmes. A large number of the alumni of the older IIMs are today occupying top leadership positions in different companies that straddle many industries including manufacturing, IT and ITES, agro business, management consultancy, investment banking and financial services, the NGO sector, micro finance, retail, etc. Many IIM alumni have been successful in establishing themselves as entrepreneurs and several alumni have established themselves as management gurus.

    You have made a plea to your alumni to contribute funds for IIMC’s infrastructure projects, when the IIMs receive government grant.

    The alumni of many US business schools have been making financial contributions to their alma maters. However, in India it is a new thing. So far the IIMs have not depended on alumni funding; however we believe that they can contribute in many other ways. Alumni funding can be very useful for undertaking many projects which may not be possible to fund through tuition fees alone. The older IIMs having reached a level of maturity and have become self-sufficient and are therefore not dependent upon the Government for funds.

    In schools abroad, don't alumni play a bigger role in the school’s activities?

    We see the role of alumni as being multi-faceted. Our alumni have been taking interest in organising workshops on strategic marketing and entrepreneurship. Many of our alumni have participated in conferences organised by us and several of them are currently playing very important roles as members of the Board of Governors. Specifically I would like to mention that Mr Ajit Balakrishnan an alumnus of the 1971 batch is currently the Chairman of the BOG of the Institute. Currently several of our alumni are involved in helping the institute design a programme to develop entrepreneurs.

    You have recently established a research centre at IIMC, but are yet to get to a 100% case-study teaching method.

    I am very confident that the case study method is very suitable for our student population. It only takes a few weeks for the students to understand the case method of teaching and learning. I sincerely believe that the case method helps the students to understand a managerial situation from multiple perspectives as in a case discussion class the faculty conducts the class in such a way that multiple viewpoints impinging on the situation are brought out. The problem that we are facing is the lack of enough cases of Indian origin. The IIMC Case Research Centre has been established with the objective of developing Indian cases for classroom use as well asoto promote case-based research.

    So our approach to research is hampering our global reputation?

    The older IIMs have already made a name for themselves. Their students are recognised all over the world, especially in the top institutions in the United States, Europe, Asia and Australia. IIMs are today recognised for their excellence in teaching but they have yet to make a mark in research and publications.

    Selection criteria in the IIMs always attracts attention.

    Each IIM has its own selection criteria; however in general, they look for various qualities that are essential to become business leaders. CAT measures different abilities including quantitative ability, data interpretation and verbal reasoning. A leader requires many other qualities which are attempted to be identified in the interview stage. Because of this, the weightage of CAT scores in the selection process has come down.

    And diversity continues to be the buzz word.

    In real life there is a lot of diversity but in the classroom in IIMs there is little diversity. Our intention is to mirror in the classroom the real diversity that is present outside. By giving additional marks to women and non- engineering applicants we would like to change the character of the applicant pool so that the selection of the final list of students to be admitted is from a larger pool.

    Even after three years, the online CAT continues to be questioned.

    The computer based CAT is very new. Over time my feeling is that this test would evolve into the adaptive type test.

    Don't placements play the biggest role in b-school selection?

    I agree that the applicants do give a lot of importance to ‘placements’ in deciding on which IIM to join. It is very natural for a candidate who has to shell out approximately Rs 10-15 lacs for the two year programme. However students need to realise that earning money cannot be the only factor that will bring happiness in life. The IIMs are trying to convey this message to the students through different courses and counselling sessions.

    • Reply
    • Like 22
    • Share 0
    • Follow
    aditimathur23, adi3005 & 20 others like this
    • Page 3 of 4  
    • BRANNICK dnt give the CAT tender to US company they are hell cheaters,,,,regards IIM A hmedabad
      #41 • 15 Sep '12 Like
    • batiatus CAT is already screwed up....pls dun screw it further by making it adaptive. It will only create further controversies. Either go back to paper-pencil based exam or start taking GMAT for ur 'prestigious' institutions
      #42 • 15 Sep '12 Like
    • sivaniim He clearly says, "By giving additional marks to women and non- engineering applicants we would like to change the character of the applicant pool so that the selection of the final list of students to be admitted is from a larger pool."

      It just means we have to perform a little more to get a call from IIM-C. After that, it is a level playing field. They are just increasing diversity in the pool of applications. The actual selection process is still unbiased.

      As far as reservation is concerned, it is a government institution and can really not do anything about it. And as shrinivassg mentioned, when OBC reservation was introduced, the seats in all IIMs were increased to make sure there is no change in number of general category seats. So, if reservation wasn't there, the seats also wouldn't have been there.

      So, stop worrying about silly things which we can't change and enter into the system in the current condition. Every year lots of students do it. So why can't we this year?


      #43 • 16 Sep '12 Like
    • TECHCRATE Dream IIM 2020 : You Should be SC/ST and your GIRL child should do BBA ( not ENGINEERING ) then only it is possible ....
      #44 • 16 Sep '12 Like 2
    • caterpilar I remember some 3-4 years back a JOKA prof. has said "we dont give weight to acads in our selection process"
      #45 • 16 Sep '12 Like
    • maverickraj Interesting interview! But much stress on the word 'Old IIMs' It seems very obvious that the management among the new and the old IIMs are not very much ready to go together.
      Though the initiatives mentioned by Shekhar Sir are really very much important, especially contribution by IIMs alumni, that is still in a very nascent stage.
      #46 • 16 Sep '12 Like 1
    • SapanG_TGEM Being a Management Student I fully agree with the Prof's point that we are really short of India based case studies. All the good cases that we get are normally from HBS, Sloan or other US Ivy League Institute. This initiative by IIM C to go for a Case Research center will surely be a (much awaited) success. It will not only bring more suitable material for management students but also will make a name for our nation.

      All the best for the endeavors.

      Sapan Gandhi
      Business Leadership Program | 2012-13
      SCHOOL of INSPIRED LEADERSHIP (SOIL)
      #47 • 16 Sep '12 Like
    • divinechamp @imcoolrvid : hey! saying,"girls stand nowhere compared to boys" is just ur conclusion which is based upon ur "unstated and biased premises" aka assumptions...hence it seems offensive. Plus saying "replacing a CREAMY LAYER boy with a MEDIOCRE girl... Which is indeed very unfortunate..." woh dude get a life!! when a girl gets selected (by topping the CAT charts) then u hardly can cast a doubt on her ability or intelligence, coz agar uska selection doubtful hai to baki boys ko select karne ka koi alag se criteria to hain nahi..iska matlab to sabme hi doubt hai (locha hai boss :P ) and above all if a girl is selected she deserves real applause coz she has to face much much things than a boy do.dd

      And speaking of the "creamy layer" as pointed out by u...most of the toppers u are talking about (which includes me as well, as i have been constant topper of my school) are jst compelled to take engg. or medical by their parents or by society or even sometimes by their teachers themselves. Toppers being the "highscorers" can't go for any other alternative (they cant go for their passion! :( ) so they have to be engg. Secondly. the main brilliance (as they asy) or the "cream" as u are saying is separated from the normal or average students by the IITs or even by the NITs. Now the rest of the level of engg we all know about...har ghar me ek enng hota hai...but wo kitna technically sound hai ye wo achhi tarah janta hai. Nextly, the people who took up engg also go for M.Tech or those who have been placed by IITs are busy doing their jobs (not all of them but ya a healthy number).
      Also the medical students, rare cases are there that any medico gives CAT. Now here u do see the "cream" spreading? it gives way to the second layer of ur "cream".
      Now how much of the cream is left to compete with??? the actual "cream" is not even in the competetion scenario!
      now for all the rest of the engg (if they are so "quaaaaalified" so as to be placed at the cream of the society!!!) why are they stepping into an altogether different field! why don't they go and innovate something new or do researches for our country???

      Moreover bro..i personally know many intelligent people choosing commerce, arts (geography, psycholgy and even social work!! ) or finearts...just because it was their passion or they wantes to become something they dreamt of, that way. So, does choosing these subjects make them jerks or have they lost their intelligence??

      Also, are u tryign to say that a pure science student doesn't falls under the cream of the society?? they are the scientists and researchers (not all of them) which lead the society wid their excellence, researches and dicoveries (like Dr. A.P.J. Abul Kalam).

      The crux of my statements.... [bole to the basic funda ;) itna bada lecture type passage likhne ka ( ah! finally mudde ki bat :P it just felt like writnig an RC passage :P lol!) ]
      ...is that u cant judge someone jst on basis of his or her marks, or the subject chosen (ek se ek maharathi bhare pade hai!) or on gender!!
      coz agar u think girls are good for nothing or mediocre or dont have a right to study wid so called "intelligent" boys...then first of all get up from such a narrow minded attitude and even if u think so (yani k mehnat bekar :P ) go on and beat them by ur talent...get selected coz batein karna alag bat hai..real competetion me face karna alag bat..

      Plus ( :P dont give that expression k aur kitna padhna padega :P thoda sa aur ;) ) when u talk of mediocrity, the acads performance is nothing whaen one goes to the real world. Just have a look who is leading the society...are the player fall in ur category of cream?? does Ambani's do?? generally most toppers end up doing the jobs where as the average students go beyond the traditional way and lead the society (along wid the toppers). So at last, actually what matters is ur success in the real world and what do u contribute to ur society and ur country, nothing else.

      bassz..finally khatam. P.S.- no offence!
      #48 • 17 Sep '12 Like
    • divinechamp sorry for any typing or other errors...jst written that all wid sleeepy eyes....this remembers me of a line "asuvidha k liye khed hai" :P to all the readers (jinhone b padhne ki mehnat ki (read it zehmat uthayi) )....regards ;)
      #49 • 17 Sep '12 Like
    • alokkhg @shamz13 In boxing everybody get different titles. i.e featherweight, lightweight etc. But in this race whether you fight in lightweight or heavyweight or any other match you will always get a heavyweight title. Think about the boxer who trained very hard and won the match but still the losing one have been declared winner because he is from different weight category.
      As steve jobs said once "Some people aren't used to an environment where excellence is expected."



      #50 • 17 Sep '12 Like
    • shamz13 @alokkhg - No, the problem here is individual categories are asked to fight against their own group only, but finally all of them are called as Boxing Champions.Government wants boxing champions from all the groups of this country, because of many reasons which most of them are not aware of. This problem has its own complexity which have been existed right from vedic period in our country. Be
      #51 • 17 Sep '12 Like
    • imcoolrvid @divinechamp -- You are missing the point. I never said all girls are MEDIOCRE... 10% girls do make it through to the IIMs every year on pure talent... And they are damn good... What I am trying to say is that if you have 90% boys and 10% girls when merit is the only selection criterion, then that clearly means that the number of Creamy Layer girls is much less than number of Creamy Layer boys. You check out any competitive and you will find the same thing. If you project the data linearly, then you find 1 girl in every 10 ranks. Let her be at no. 5 (just as an aproximation). Let us consider an IIM with 100 seats. Then in terms of rank, the 10 girls selected for 100 seats would be ranked 5, 15, 25,......,85, 95. Now when you talk of getting say 25% girls to increase the diversity (by giving grace marks to girls), then you are effectively replacing 15 boys having AIR 84, 86, 87, 88,..., 94,96,..., 99,100 by 15 girls having AIR 105,115, 125,....., 235, 245. So effectively, due to the extra grace marks given to girls, a boy with All-India Rank 84 misses out while a girl with AIR 245 gets in. Now if that IIM had 400 seats and you give grace marks to increase diversity from the natural 10% to a forced 25%, then that would mean that 60 extra girls will get in at the cost of 60 better boys just because of gender. A boy ranked 334 in the overall merit list [including all parameters (other than Grace Marks for gender) and not just CAT score] will miss out, whereas, a girl ranked 995 will get in (just because of unsubstantiated GRACE MARKS)... Something which I find to be outrageously RIDICULOUS !!!!!
      #52 • 17 Sep '12 Like
    • imcoolrvid @divinechamp -- The above logic will hold good for the forced diversity according to educational backgrounds as well. The 90-10 rule holds good in the engineer, non-engineer case as well. And as for you contention that many IITians and NITians go for M.Tech or jobs, you should know that current intake of IITs is about 8,000-10,000. For NITs it is 12,000-15,000. So roughly 20k-25k IITians and NITians are passing out each year. The intake of all IIMs together is about 3k-4K. So, you see there should be no problems in finding sufficient IITians and NITians to fill up the IIM seats. And that is what happens in reality also. Most of the engineers getting in are IIT/NIT grads. So, your contention that there aren't enough meritorious engineers aspiring for the IIMs due to migration to M.Tech/jobs is completely wrong. When you are taking non-engineer or female candidates forcibly through grace marks, you are effectively replacing some much more talented guys from IIT/NIT/Other top Engg Colleges (who could have done something big and made the country proud) with a girl/non-engineer who is only looking to exploit the IIM brand (obtained through GRACE MARKS) to land a top job. There are girls/non-engineers in each batch of IIMs. Check out how they are faring compared to the IITians/NITians there. It is no surprise that the guys who were the CREAM of the country at 10+2 level, continue to remain the CREAM after graduation as well. :)
      #53 • 17 Sep '12 Like
    • VP @adityaknsit: TRUE. Now that is how I will make u feel what u made me feel after all this reservations n quotas. Now helplessly see me enter into your area :D
      #54 • 18 Sep '12 Like 1
    • shrinivassg @bon2rle, It would be good if you can shut up your mouth in case you do not know other people's credentials. Be part of a proper discussion not mudslinging. I am a general engineer guy. I am now at @IIM.Ahmedabad. I have competed.
      Lesson for you: If you dont know, it is better to shut up than let your self blabber shit.
      #55 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • shrinivassg And yeah. Attn: @Apurv to @bon2rle's comment. I am not sure we should be encouraging such stuff on PG :)
      #56 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • sagac I don't see any proper justification of IIMs normalization . If they have to gauge an applicant on the basis his/her academics then at least they should first set the metrics properly. I have no clue why there are ranges of 5 percentages to evaluate and normalize academics(70-80% => x index marks) . Why it couldn't be a simple and more justified scale of 1 index marks per percentage, so that it wont be an injustice to people who have scored 79 or 89 and can't do anything about it but to curse their luck.
      #57 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • bhargav_it Wherever you see the most unlucky are OC Boys..
      #58 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • Apurv @bon2rle 's comment deleted for being a flame-bait.
      #59 • 18 Sep '12 Like 1
    • shrinivassg @sagac, even in that case, there'll be people cursing their luck :).
      @Apurv, thanks man! :)
      #60 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • Page 4 of 4  
    • sagac @shrinivassg baat toh sahi hai sir jee but still i find normalization criteria skewed , something has to be done about it.
      #61 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • shrinivassg @sagac Whatever you do, people will be cribbing. That's my point. It wont be you. It'll be someone else. You can never satisfy everyone. :)

      #62 • 18 Sep '12 Like
    • murty001 @naga25french - I thought by now you would be knowing that CAT selects people to become 'Managers' not 'Leaders' :mg:. And being in an IT company I don't think you would need me to tell you the difference ;). Leadership is a quality that cannot be completely tested via a 'test'. So what these B-Schools do is have an elimination contest and select the top scorer in their tests, ask the candidate vague questions in the interview(how many metres does a kangaroo jump in a day, who was the first white president of Ghana if there was ever one) and then select the candidate with the full conviction that they have selected the best of the lot. Some of these people actually make it to some top positions in various organizations riding on the back of a rubber stamp and then you have incidents like Manesar, VISA frauds, money laundering etc. There was this person - about whom I have read extensively and who is my role model- who was the chairman of one of Indias largest corporate groups and never presided over a workers Union agitation during his tenure. If you have not guessed it already, I am talking about J.R.D.Tata. Trust me, if anyone is still around of that caliber, they would do just fine even without CAT and (enter the name of your exam here) :).
      #63 • 20 Sep '12 Like 2
    • Psychamour @murty001 Bang On the Target !
      #64 • 20 Sep '12 Like
    • B I U
      Press Shift+Enter to add a new line.

    • © 2013 PaGaLGuY
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Help
    • Privacy
    Report This Content ×

    Your report does not guarantee removal of this content from the site. It will be removed altogether only if a Moderator finds it especially useless after reviewing it.

    Warn User

    ×

    Repeal a Warning

    ×

    Promote this post

    ×
    web04:8031